A writ petition and application were dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file appropriate proceedings under the disputes resolution mechanism.
dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with the disputes resolution mechanism
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
#32
M/S PALAK CONSTUCTION PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Samrendra Kumar, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. S. Hari Haran, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 14.01.2016
After some arguments, learned counsel for petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with the disputes resolution mechanism.
With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition and application are dismissed as withdrawn.
MANMOHAN, J
JANUARY 14, 2016 rn
M/S PALAK CONSTUCTION PVT LTD
UNION OF INDIA
MANMOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
