Petitioner's writ petition regarding hostel withdrawal was disposed of as infructuous since he had already submitted his Ph.D. thesis, rendering the punishment ineffective.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
#51
$~
ARIHANT KUMAR VARDHAN ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, Advocate
versus
VICE CHANCELLOR, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate for JNU.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 14.01.2016
Since the petitioner has already submitted his Ph.D. thesis and the only punishment meted to him by virtue of the impugned order was withdrawal of hostel accommodation for one semester, this Court is of the view that present petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
MANMOHAN, J
JANUARY 14, 2016 rn
Arihan Vardhan
Vice Chancellor, Jawaharlal Nehru University
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
