Allowed
Nadeem Babar Siddique v. University of Delhi
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/4651/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18 $~
NADEEM BABAR SIDDIQUE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Akbar Siddique, Advocate with Mr. Ehteshan Hashmi, Advocate.
versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate with Ms. Simran Jeet, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 23.05.2016
CM Appl. 19306/2016 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 4651/2016
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 4651/2016
Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondentUniversity to add the marks subsequently awarded by the College to the petitioner in the internal assessment of first year.
It has been averred in the petition that petitioner in 2009 got admission through sports quota in B.A. History (Hons.). Petitioner gave his third year examination in 2013, but due to non-clearance of Ancient India paper in the first year, he has not been able to complete his Graduation.
Learned counsel for petitioner states that inadvertently petitioner was not awarded additional marks in his internal assessment subjects of first year by the college on account of his having missed classes while participating in sports activities. He states that upon a representation dated 04th April, 2016 being made by the petitioner, the college admitted its mistake and awarded one-third extra benefit on account of petitioner attending sports events for the college. He states that though the respondent-College sent a letter dated 18th April, 2016 to respondent-University to make correction in petitioner's internal assessment marks 2009, the respondent-University has not taken any decision till date.
Consequently, present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent-University to take a decision with regard to respondent-College's letter dated 18th April, 2016 within a period of four weeks.
In the event, petitioner is aggrieved by the decision of the respondentUniversity, he shall be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
MANMOHAN, J
MAY 23, 2016 js
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the University of Delhi was directed to act upon an application to correct internal assessment marks following the college's admission of error?
Nadeem Babar Siddique
University of Delhi
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court