The petitioner withdrew the writ petition with liberty to file a representation. The Court disposed of the petition without expressing any opinion on the merits, leaving all rights and contentions open.
Withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file a representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43 $~
SERVICE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE ON FAMILY AND CHILDREN (SERFAC) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, Advocate.
versus
INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate with Mr. Kulish Tanwar, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 23.05.2016
Learned counsel for petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a representation with respondent-University.
With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition stands disposed of.
However, it is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the controversy. Rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.
MANMOHAN, J
MAY 23, 2016 js
SERVICE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE ON FAMILY AND CHILDREN (SERFAC)
INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY
MANMOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
