Single judge order disposing of a PIL challenging a government decision on compassionate appointment. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the appointment was not acted upon as the beneficiary refused it.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr.Gautam Narayan, ASC, Mr.R.A.Iyer, Mr.S.Banerji, Advs. for GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
O R D E R % 14.09.2016
CHIEF JUSTICE
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 'anb'
W.P.(C) 4143/2016
Page 2 of 2.
Avadh Kaushik
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
