The High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition where the widow of an eligible street vendor sought to have her name substituted. The court issued directions for the Town Vending Committee to consider the petitioner's application.
Directions issued to the Town Vending Committee to consider the petitioner's application expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
MAMATA ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Adv.
versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR
..... Respondents Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr.Mananjay Kr. Mishra, Ms.Vidhi Jain and Mr.Shailzananda Mishra, Advs. for NDMC along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R % 06.12.2016
CM No. 45382-45383/2016
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
The applications are disposed of.
W.P.(C) 11522/2016 & CM No.45384/2016
The petitioner claims to be widow of Sh.Mahender Singh who was a eligible squatter and vending at “Near Subway of INA Market”. Sh.Mahender Singh died on 1st February, 2016. The petitioner prays that her name be substituted in place of her husband. Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, Advocate, who enters appearance on advance copy, refutes the averments made in the writ petition. He submits that the name of husband of the petitioner does not find mentioned in the list of 628 eligible street vendors.
He further submits that the age of the petitioner as per the Adhar Card placed on record does not match with the averments made in the writ petition.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction be issued to the Town Vending Committee to consider the case of the petitioner. Counsel further submits that relevant documents would be placed before the Town Vending Committee. Learned counsel for the NDMC submits that in case an application is made to the Town Vending Committee, the same shall be considered in accordance with law and expeditiously.
With these directions, the writ petition and all applications are disposed of. Dasti.
G.S.SISTANI, J.
VINOD GOEL, J.
DECEMBER 06, 2016/jitender
Mamata
New Delhi Municipal Council
G.S. Sistani
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
