Petitioner sought to withdraw W.P.(C) 3663/2016 with liberty to make a representation before authorities and avail further legal remedies if grievance remained unredressed. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to make representation before authorities and avail legal remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~185
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRINCE AJAZ BAHADUR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Himal Akhtar and Mr. M. Aijaz Hussain, Advs. versus
UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harish Kumar Garg, Adv. for R1. Mr. Arun Birbal, Adv. for DDA. Mr. Shashi Gupta, Adv. for MCD. Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Adv. for SDMC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 03.05.2016
CM No.15689/2016
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 3663/2016
After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation before the concerned authorities in accordance with law. It is further submitted that the petitioner shall avail appropriate legal remedies available to him in the event if his grievance is not redressed by the competent authorities.
This petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
MAY 03, 2016 ak
PRINCE AJAZ BAHADUR
UOI AND ORS
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
