The judgment contains only a notice to renotify an order; substantive content is absent in the provided text.
The judgment contains only a notice to renotify an order; substantive content is absent in the provided text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
FINANCIAL SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED
..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikrm Sobti, Ms. Aakanksha Kaul and Mr. Karan Luthra, Advocates.
versus
THE COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS.
..... Respondents Through Mr. Udayan Jain with Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 13.04.2018
Renotify on 14.05.2018.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
APRIL 13, 2018 st
Financial Software and Systems Private Limited
The Competition Commission of India
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
