This is an expeditious order where the writ petition was disposed of with directions to the respondent to dispose of the underlying matter regularly and preferably within six months.
Disposed of; directions issued to respondent no.1 to dispose of the matter expeditiously within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
versus
SDM KAPASHERA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Satyakam, ASC, GNCTD, for R- 1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 02.02.2016
Learned counsel for the respondent no.1 appears on advance notice. Short affidavit has been placed on record. Learned counsel for the respondent no.1 submits that hearing is going on regular basis before the Revenue Court. Next date fixed in the matter is 22nd February, 2016. He further submits that efforts would be made to dispose of the matter expeditiously. Accordingly, present writ petition is disposed of with the directions to the respondent no.1 to dispose of the matter expeditiously and preferably within six months.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
FEBRUARY 02, 2016/ dk
Brahm Prakash and Ors.
SDM Kapasher
A.K. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
