This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
No one appears for the petitioner. Even on 26th November, 2015 and 21st December, 2015 petitioner remained unrepresented. Vide order dated 11th December, 2014 Director, Vigilance of the respondent was directed to investigate the matter and report as to whether petitioner has been ‘set up’or has any ‘hidden agenda’ in filing the present petition.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that petitioner was not found available at the given address. Present writ petition appears to be a motivated one. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
FEBRUARY 01, 2016 ga
Azad
East Delhi Municipal Corporation
A.K. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
