Petitioner withdrew the writ petition after conceding factual dispute and filing a civil suit; court dismissed the matter as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
..... Petitioner Through Mr. I. Ahmed, Advocate for Mr. S. D. Ansari, Advocate versus MOHSIN & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Suryakant Singhla, Advocate for R-4 Ms. Mansi Gupta, Advocate for NDMC/R5 Mr. Bahar U. Barqui, Advocate for R- 3 Mr. M. B. Singh, Advocate for R-6 with SI Prakash, PS Sadar Bazar
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR O R D E R % 18.07.2016
Counsel for the petitioner fairly concedes that factual dispute is involved in this matter. He further submits that he has filed a civil suit seeking appropriate remedy.
In view of the afore noted development, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this petition and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the same. Permission is granted.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
JULY 18, 2016 gb
MOSJID MOHAMMADI AHALADIS
MOHSIN & ORS
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
