Petitioner withdrew a writ petition as unauthorized constructions were demolished during its pendency. The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petitioner’s application/prayer to withdraw the petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
RAJENDER KUMAR RAWAL ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Saurabh and Mr. R.R. Mishra, Advocates
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR
..... Respondent
Through Mr. M.K.Sharma, Advocate for R-1
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 15.07.2016
Counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of this petition information has been received by the petitioners that the unauthorized constructions stand demolished by the Department. His submission is that this petition has accordingly become infructuous and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the same.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
JULY 15, 2016 gb
RAJENDER KUMAR RAWAL
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
