The petitioner sought directions to grant ACP benefits and requested liberty to withdraw the petition to file a fresh one later. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner the liberty to file a fresh petition with explanation.
Liberty granted to file a fresh writ petition with proper explanation for delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11.
PREMANAND ..... Petitioner Through: Dr. K.P.S. Dalal, Advocate with Mr. Ranjit Singh, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Rishabh Sahu, Mr. Gaurav Shukla, Advocates, Mr. B.K. Rout, Pairvy Officer and Mr. S.S. Sejwal, Law Officer, CRPF.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 18.03.2016
W.P.(C) 2304/2016
Page 1 of 2
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
MARCH 18, 2016
rkb
W.P.(C) 2304/2016 Page 2 of 2
Premanand
Union of India
Hima Kohli
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
