In this writ petition regarding monetary benefits and arrears for police inspectors, the Delhi High Court dismissed the petition upon receiving Government confirmation that similarly situated personnel had already been granted re-assigned seniority in compliance with a related judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
INSP/GD BIDYADHAR BEHRA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Medhanshu Tripathi & Mr. A.K. Singh, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC & Mr. Brijesh Kumar, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 12.05.2016
Page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) 2108/2016
petitioners submits that the respondents have not considered the case of similarly placed petitioners.
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
MAY 12, 2016
r
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 2108/2016
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to monetary benefits and arrears at par with batch mates following the decision in a related suit concerning similarly situated personnel?
Whether the department has complied with the earlier order granting seniority at par with a specific batch mate?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Anil Kumar Chauhan Vs. Union of India & ors.Referred¶10
W.P.(C) 8371/2015
INSPECTOR GAD BIDDYADHAR BEHRA & ORS.
UNION OF INDIA
HIMA KOHLI
SUNIL GAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
