Manoj Kumar Nath v. Union of India & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court listed a writ petition for arguments before a different bench to ensure presence of claimant counsel.
What the court decided
$~36
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 4284/2016
MANOJ KUMAR NATH ..... Petitioner Represented by: None
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Vivekanand Mishra, Senior Panel Counsel
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 18.07.2016
CM No.22971/2016
Keeping in view the prayer made in the application, which relates to the presence of Sh.Vivekanand Mishra counsel, as claimed by him, but not recorded in the order authored by a Bench comprising Hima Kohli, J. and Sunil Gaur, J., the application is directed to be listed before a Bench comprising Hima Kohli, J. and Sunil Gaur, J. on July 22, 2016.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manoj Kumar Nath
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
Pradeep Nandrajog
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court