The High Court of Delhi allowed a Constitutional Appeal seeking exemption in a writ petition upon withdrawal by the petitioner citing lapsed proceedings before a subordinate trial court.
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions; writ petition withdrawn by petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
39
$~
RANJIT SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. D.P. Singh, Advocate with Ms. Raj Kiran Vats and Ms. Kanika Khurana, Advocates.
versus
GNCTD OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate for GNCT of Delhi with SI Mohinder Singh, PS Rajouri Garden, New Delhi.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 09.03.2016
CM Appl. 8742/2016 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 2024/2016
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 2024/2016
After some arguments, learned counsel for petitioners wishes to withdraw the present writ petition in view of the pendency of the proceedings before Ms. Raj Rani, Additional District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts (West District), Delhi.
Since learned counsel for petitioners states that there is urgency in the matter, the trial Court is requested to expeditiously dispose of the same.
MANMOHAN, J
MARCH 09, 2016 js
RANJIT SINGH & ORS
GNCTD OF DELHI & ANR
MANMOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
