The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed the same accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
HIMALAYAN YOUTH EMPOWERMENT SOCIETY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr K.B. Upadhayay and Mr S.N. Tripathi
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Ms Mini Pushkarna with Ms Anushruti and Ms Yoothica Pallavi
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R
% 26.02.2016
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ
petition. The permission is granted.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
FEBRUARY 26, 2016 SU
HIMALAYAN YOUTH EMPOWERMENT SOCIETY
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
