Petitioner sought permission to withdraw writ petition on account of inaccuracies with liberty to refile. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn subject to liberty to file the corrected petition. No other relief granted.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file the petition after removing errors.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
MAN MOHAN KAUR ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr Vinay Kumar Shailendra, Advocate.
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for R-1 &2/L&B/LAC. Mr Faisal M.Aboobacker, Advocate for DDA.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 04.03.2016
CM No.7791/2016(exemption)
Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 1810/2016 & CM No.7790/2016(stay)
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition as certain inaccuracies have crept into the writ petition. He seeks liberty to file the petition after removing the errors.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
R.K.GAUBA, J
MARCH 04, 2016 ‘sn’
MAN MOHAN KAUR
GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
R.K. GAUBA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
