The writ petition and miscellaneous applications were withdrawn by the petitioner. The court disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~64
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAM MOHAN TIWARI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Tiwari and Mr. Rishabh Kaushik, Advs. versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 25.02.2016
After arguing for some time learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
leave to withdraw the writ petition.
Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Miscellaneous applications
are disposed of as withdrawn.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
FEBRUARY 25, 2016 ga
Ram Mohan Tiwari
South Delhi Municipal Corporation
A.K. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
