Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition filed regarding encroachment on his land. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn and miscellaneous applications as infructuous.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted. Petition and miscellaneous applications disposed of as withdrawn and infructuous respectively.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
versus
THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Avtar Singh, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Nikhil Goel and Mr. Naveen Goel, Advs. for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 23.02.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that suit has already been
filed by the petitioner against the private parties who have encroached upon
his land. He seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
FEBRUARY 23, 2016 ga
Oruj Ahmed
The Additional Commissioner of Police & Anr
A.K. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
