The court dismissed a batch of writ petitions (W.P.(C). 16393-400/2006) for default and non-prosecution as petitioners failed to appear despite receiving intimation from respondent counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-80
ANNAKUTTY ABRAHAM & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Nemo .
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
%
O R D E R 09.03.2016
Page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) 16393-16400/2006
petitions, which are accordingly dismissed in default and for nonprosecution.
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
MARCH 09, 2016
r
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 16393-16400/2006
Annakutty Abraham & Ors.
Union of India & Ors.
Hima Kohli
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
