High Court of Delhi order dismissing a writ petition in default and for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear before the court despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-74
Through: None
versus
OFFICER INCHARGE RECORDS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate for Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 03.03.2016
.1. The present matter has remained on the regular board since 03.02.2016. However, none had appeared for the petitioner when the case was taken up on 12.02.2016, 23.02.2016 and even on 24.02.2016. On 24.02.2016, Ms. Barkha Babbar, learned counsel for the respondents had stated that she had duly informed the counsel for the petitioner about the pendency of the present petition both, telephonically as also through speed post and he had requested her to inform the Court that he would be unable to attend the Court on the said date. In the interest of justice, no adverse orders were passed on 24.02.2016.
W.P.(C) 13769/2006 Page 1 of 2
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
MARCH 03, 2016
rkb
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 13769/2006
NK Harvir Sigh
Officer Incharge Records
Hima Kohli
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
