This is a single line order where Justice Hima Kohli and Justice Sunil Gaur allowed withdrawal of W.P. 11062/2015 regarding BSF review medical examination results. The petitioner obtained unfit declaration and withdrew the petition.
Petitioner allowed to withdraw the petition; pending applications disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5.
RAHUL SINGH ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R
% 03.03.2016
for directions to the respondents, in particular respondent No.4/BSF, to convey the result of his review medical examination, conducted in the year
time to obtain instructions from the BSF. Today, he hands over a copy of the letter dated 08.06.2013 addressed to IG (HQ), BSF, forwarding the Board proceedings of the review medical examination for the post of CT/GD-2012.
He states that as per the Board proceedings held between 21.05.2016 to
WP(C) 11062/2015 Page 1 of 2
05.06.2013, at BSF Chhawla Camp, New Delhi, the petitioner, whose name features at Sr.No.728 of the Result Sheet, has been declared unfit. A copy of the aforesaid document is taken on record with a copy furnished to the
counsel for the petitioner.
adjudication in the present petition and prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.
withdrawn alongwith the pending applications.
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
MARCH 03, 2016 rkb
WP(C) 11062/2015 Page 2 of 2
Rahul Singh
Union of India
Hima Kohli
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
