The petitioner withdrew the petition. The court dismissed the petition allowing the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum by way of a civil suit.
Liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum by way of Civil Suit, if so permitted by law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
..... Petitioner Through Ms.Ruchika Sharma and Mr. N.S.Dalal, Advocates.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
..... Respondents Through Mr.Satyakam, Addl. Standing Counsel for GNCTD/R-1 to R-3. Mr.Raghuvinder Verma, Advocate for R-4 to R-7.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR O R D E R % 19.07.2016
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing this petition. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed a withdraw with liberty granted to the petitioner to approached the appropriate forum by way of Civil Suit, if so permitted by the law.
Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
JULY 19, 2016 ndn
RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATION
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
