The High Court of Delhi at New Delhi allowed the petitioner to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18.
SUSHILA DEVI
..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Sumit Babbar, Mr. Om Prakash & Mr. Ravindra Pandey, Advocates.
versus
GENERAL MANAGER MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. R. Sudhinder, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 19.02.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the
present writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
FEBRUARY 19, 2016 VKR
Sushila Devi
General Manager Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited
Sanjiv Khanna
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
