This order notes that documents relied upon in a charge sheet have been furnished to the petitioner's counsel. It clarifies that an interim relief prayer is pending and directs the petitioner to raise urgency before the tribunal, before disposing of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17.
JAWAHAR THAKUR
..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nitesh Rana & Mr. Saikat Sarkar, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC & Ms. Shraddha Bhargava, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 19.02.2016
Mr. Raman Kapur, learned senior counsel with reference to order
dated 18th January, 2016 has submitted that the respondents have still not
furnished the documents relied upon in the charge sheet and this fact has not
been noticed in the impugned order dated 1st February, 2016. Mr. Raman
Kapur has today in the Court furnished the said list of documents to the counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents submits
that these documents have already been furnished, but in view of the prayer made and to avoid any controversy, another set would be supplied to the
counsel for the petitioner within ten days in terms of the list at pages 206207.
Another grievance raised by the petitioner is that MA No. 383/2016 for interim relief has been disposed of. We perceive and believe that the said observation in the order dated 1st February, 2016, has been made as the petitioner herein has also made a similar prayer for interim relief in the OA itself. The prayer in the OA, it is apparent from the order dated 1st February, 2016 is pending and would be considered on the next date of hearing. With the aforesaid clarification, we dispose of the present writ petition.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is urgency in the matter. It will be open to the petitioner to raise the said contention before the tribunal.
DASTI.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
FEBRUARY 19, 2016 VKR
JAWAHAR THAKUR
UNION OF INDIA & ANR
SANJIV KHANNA
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
