In W.P.(C) 1314/2016, the Bench treated the writ petition as withdrawn. The order noted the petition was filed after a delay of over a year but dismissed the matter 'as withdrawn' on February 18, 2016, granting the petitioner the liberty they had prayed for.
Liberty as prayed for granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY (INDIA) LTD. ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Usha Singh, Adv.
versus M/S MCRAJ PAPER MILLS PVT. LTD. & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
% 18.02.2016
CM 5760/2016
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 1314/2016
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
FEBRUARY 18, 2016 /‘ga’
Assets Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd.
M/S MCRAJ Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Pradeep Nandrajog
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
