In this one-line order, the Court disposed of the petition as infructuous on the record of a one-time settlement agreement entered into between the petitioner and the respondent bank.
The petition is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
ARCHANA MISHRA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.B.S.Nagar, Adv.
versus
ALLAHABAD BANK & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Reema Khorana, Adv. for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
% 17.02.2016
2.05 crores has been accepted by the Allahabad Bank. After adjusting amounts received and giving credit thereto, post-dated cheques in sum of 53 lakhs have been issued and received by Allahabad Bank.MUKTA GUPTA, J.
FEBRUARY 17, 2016 /‘ga’
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Archana Mishra
Allahabad Bank & Ors.
Pradeep Nandrajog
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court