Petitioner, a Sub-Inspector, sought protection of seniority. The court condoned a 54-day delay in refiling the petition, recorded a reply to a legal notice, and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting liberty to file a fresh petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file a fresh substantive petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
BANSHI DHAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R. K. Shukla, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, Central Government Standing Counsel
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 19.02.2016
C.M. 5709/2016 (u/S 151 CPC)
For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 54 days in refiling the accompanying petition is condoned.
Application is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 1292/2016
that he had qualified the pre-promotional course on the first attempt.
Page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) 1292/2016
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
FEBRUARY 19, 2016 r
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 1292/2016
Banshi Dhar
Union of India
Hima Kohli
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
