The petitioner complained of respondents' non-furnishing of documents to file an appeal. The court observed that documents were supplied via counsel under a dated letter, received by the petitioner, and disposed of the petition.
Petition disposed of; liberty granted to file substantive representation against the dismissal order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
OM PRAKASH RAWAT ..... Petitioner Through: : Mr. Prakash Deep, proxy counsel for Mr. Amit Attri, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Gautam with Dr. G.L. Bhatia, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 18.02.2016
which date, counsel for the petitioner had raised a grievance that the respondents had not furnished all the relevant documents to enable
the petitioner to file an appeal against the dismissal order dated 22.3.2006 issued by the respondent No.2. In response, counsel for the respondents had assured the Court that the relevant documents shall be furnished to the petitioner within three weeks, and the case was adjourned to await compliance.
W.P.(C) 11807/2015 Page 1 of 2
which was duly received by the other side on 29.1.2016. He hands over the proof of receipt of the relevant documents, which is taken on record.
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
FEBRUARY 18, 2016 sk/rkb
W.P.(C) 11807/2015 Page 2 of 2
Om Prakash Rawat
Union of India
Hima Kohli
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
