The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the Union Public Service Commission as withdrawn, with liberty to file a review application, along with connected miscellaneous cases.
Writ petition and connected miscellaneous cases dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravinder Aggarwal, Advocate
versus
YOGENDER BABU SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: None
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
O R D E R
% 12.02.2016
After some hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the present writ petition. He states that the petitioner will file a review application, if so advised.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. CM Nos.5146-5138 are also dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2016 tp
UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
YOGENDER BABU SHARMA
Sanjiv Khanna
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
