In this writ petition, the Court upheld the CAT's order dismissing the petitioner's application for condonation of delay to restore an old OA. Finding the delay unjustified due to loss of interest, the Court dismissed the petition.
The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ram Ali, Advocate for respondent Nos.1-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R % 05.12.2016
on 13.10.2001 for the post of Fire Operators with the Delhi Fire Services.
years and nine months. Apparently, the interest of the petitioner got revived because OA No.426/2005, filed by one Manoj Kumar, was allowed by the Tribunal vide order dated 28.10.2014. We notice that the same order dismissed several applications for intervention on the ground of delay and laches.
years and nine months in filing the restoration application.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
DECEMBER 05, 2016 tp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the CAT order dismissing the application for condonation of delay for restoration of OA relating to selection for Fire Operator post.
Balraj
Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors
Sanjiv Khanna
Chander Shekhar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
