The petitioner sought directions for disposal of references within a statutory period of 90 days. The respondent counsel confirmed adherence to this timeline, resulting in the dispositive order allowing the petition.
Petitioner was told to wait for the direction to be issued by the respondent government.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr Peeyoosh Kalra, Mr Shiva Sharma and Mr Sona Babar with Mr Harbans Yadav, Advocates for R-1 to 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R
% 08.12.2016 CM No.42305/2016 (exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 10811/2016
The petitioner seeks a direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to ensure that the references made by the petitioner are disposed of within the statutory period of ninety days.
Learned counsel for the respondent, under instructions, submits that the references made by the petitioner shall be disposed of within the period of ninety days. The statement is taken on record. The respondents shall remain bound by the statements given in the Court.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
DECEMBER 08, 2016/ ‘Sn’
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directions should be issued to ensure disposal of references within 90 days.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S MECAMIDI HPP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
