The Court corrected the cause title and noted that the underlying appeal was remitted to the ITAT for fresh consideration based on a prior order. This interim order acknowledges the correction and leaves the matter in those terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
versus M/S SIR SHADI LAL ENTERPRISES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Arta Trana Panda, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 14.03.2016
corrected order shall read as under:
“THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-III ..... Appellant Through: Mr P. Roy Chaudhuri, Senior Standing Counsel.
versus
M/S SIR SHADI LAL ENTERPRISES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Arta Trana Panda, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R % 07.07.2015
CM No. 20972/2014 (for condonation of delay of 395 days in filing the appeal)
ITA 779/2014
S.MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
MARCH 14, 2016/MK
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-III
M/S SIR SHADI LAL ENTERPRISES LTD.
S.MURALIDHAR
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
