The Delhi High Court corrected the cause title and discussed the prior order dated 07.07.2015 which set aside the ITAT order and remitted the appeal for fresh consideration on merits. The current order affirmed that lead.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
versus M/S SIR SHADI LAL ENTERPRISES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Arta Trana Panda, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 14.03.2016
corrected order shall read as under:
“THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-III ..... Appellant Through: Mr P. Roy Chaudhuri, Senior Standing Counsel.
versus
M/S SIR SHADI LAL ENTERPRISES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Arta Trana Panda, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R % 07.07.2015
CM No. 20964/2014 (for condonation of delay of 395 days in filing the appeal)
ITA 775/2014
S.MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
MARCH 14, 2016/MK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay should be granted in an income tax appeal filed after a lapse of 395 days.
The Commissioner of Income Tax Central-III
M/S Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Ltd.
S. Muralidhar
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
