On 04.03.2015, the plaintiff's withdrawal application under O. XXIII R 1 CPC was allowed and the suit dismissed as settled, with defendants confirming the out-of-court settlement.
The plaintiff's application was allowed; the suit was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35.
VINOD KUMAR GUPTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajender Agarwal, Advocate with the plaintiff in person.
versus
SMT. SEEMA SETHI & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Jabar Singh, Advocate for D-1 to D-3. Mr. H.C. Kharbanda, Advocate for D-4.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
O R D E R % 04.03.2015
I.A. 4585/2015 (by the plaintiff u/O XXIII R 1 CPC)
confirm that the parties have arrived at an out of court settlement.
Page 1 of 2
CS(OS) 185/2008
Counsels for the parties confirm that the fee of the Local Commissioner has already been paid by them.
HIMA KOHLI, J
MARCH 04, 2015 rkb
Page 2 of 2
CS(OS) 185/2008
VINOD KUMAR GUPTA
SMT. SEEMA SETHI
HIMA KOHLI
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
