This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
Through: Mr Anand Mishra
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (SDMC) ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sanjay Poddar, Sr Advocate with Mr Mukesh Gupta and Mr Govind Kumar with Mr Arun Kumar, Co.- Advt., SDMC
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R
% 05.11.2015
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has instructions from the
partner of the petitioner firm, who is also present in court, to withdraw this writ petition. Permission is granted.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order stands vacated.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
NOVEMBER 05, 2015 SU
M/S. ALMASS INDIA
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (SDMC)
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
