The High Court of Delhi directly disposed of the writ petition and connected connected connected connected matter as infructuous by virtue of an order passed in a related writ petition on the same day. No substantive relief was granted or denied on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
SHASHI KANDWAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Mahavir Singh, Mr Sanjeev K. Saroha and Mr K. Venkatraman
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Sanjay Poddar, Sr Advocate with Mr Mukesh Gupta and Mr Govind Kumar
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
O R D E R % 05.11.2015
CM No. 25759/2015 (exemption)
The exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 10332/2015 and CM No. 25758/2015
In view of the order passed in W.P.(C) 9505/2015 today itself, this writ petition
has become infructuous.
It is disposed of as such.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
NOVEMBER 05, 2015 SU
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.(C) 9505/2015Referred¶12
Shashi Kandwal
South Delhi Municipal Corporation
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
