The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a transfer order. The court noted that the respondents had modified the order prior to the hearing, relieving the petitioner on a future date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
SHIV KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Ashok Kumar, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC and Mr Waize Ali Noor, Ms Prerna shah Deo, Mr Gyanesh Bhardwaj, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R
% 03.07.2015
The petitioner has sought the intervention of this Court in respect of the transfer order by which he was directed to join 129 Battalion, BSF in Punjab. He sought for the modification/withdrawal of the order on the ground of medical condition of his son. On the previous date of hearing, this Court had directed the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner.
Today, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents sought liberty and placed on record a copy of the order dated 02.07.2015, whereby the impugned transfer order has been modified and the petitioner has been told that he would be relieved on 01.04.2016 to report to 129 Battalion, BSF. In case the petitioner has any further request, it is open to him to represent to the authorities in this regard. A copy of the said order dated 02.07.2015 is hereby taken on record.
The writ petition is disposed of in above terms along with the pending application.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
JULY 03, 2015/bg
Shiv Kumar
Union of India
S. Ravindra Bhat
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
