The petitioner challenged a transfer order directing him to Chhattisgarh. The court allowed him to make a representation for a six-month deferment based on his daughter's medical condition before his reported date.
Petitioner permitted to make a representation for six-month deferment due to daughter's medical condition; matter disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
BHAUSAHEB PALGHADMAL
Petitioner
Through: Ms Jyoti Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr V.Mohan and Ms Tina Bajwa, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC and Mr T.P. Singh, Adv for UOI Mr S.S. Sejwal, Law Officer, CRPF
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
The grievance of the petitioner is that he ought to be retained in Pune, where he is currently posted. However, vide signal communication dated 17.04.2015, he is directed to report to 150 Batallion, Chhattisgarh.
The respondents today produced the copy of an order of the directive contained in a signal communication dated 26.06.2015, which states that the petitioner’s request to continue in the present place of posting, i.e., Pune has been acceded to and the order originally directed him to report to the next posting at 150 Batallion on 25.08.2016.
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that having regard to the acute medical condition of the petitioner’s daughter, he may be permitted to make a representation having regard to the subsequent developments during the interregnum and that if request for further deferment for up to 6 months is made, the same may be favourably considered.
It is open to the petitioner to make a representation, if so advised having regard to the later developments with respect to the medical conditions and progress of his daughter well before date. He has now been directed to report to 150 Batallion on 25.08.2016. The representation, if made, sometime in April, 2016, shall be decided and communicated to the petitioner well before the said date and in any event within two weeks of receipt of the representation.
The writ petition is disposed of.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
JULY 01, 2015 bg
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation for further deferment of his transfer posting due to his daughter's acute medical condition.
Bhausahib Palghadmial
Union of India
S. Ravindra Bhat
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
