Munnalal Dewangan v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal as infructuous on account of subsequent event; writ petition WPS No. 9429 of 2019; petitioner Munnalal Dewangan; respondents State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Urban Administration and Development, Director Urban Administration and Development, Joint Director Urban Administration and Development Regional Office Bilaspur; decided 05.02.2026 by Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; counsel Ms. Shivangi Agrawal (petitioner), Mr. Amit Buxy Dy. Government Advocate (State); no statute or precedent citation; no monetary quantum; NAFR certified copy digitally signed 2026.02.05.
What did the court decide?
The Court accepted counsel's submission that a subsequent event had rendered the petition infructuous, and dismissed the petition as having been rendered infructuous. ¶22