Dismissed¶¶32

Mamta Vaishnav v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC16 Jun 2026WPS/4621/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur; WPS No. 4621 of 2018; Mamta Vaishnav v. State of Chhattisgarh; promotion; Assistant Teacher (Panchayat); Shiksha Karmi Grade II; Teacher (Panchayat); Zila Panchayat Mungeli; promotion order dated 10.10.2022; grievance redressed; petition dismissed with liberty to revive; Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey; order dated 17.06.2026; NAFR.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; petitioner left at liberty to revive her prayer if the cause of action still subsists. ¶¶32

Mamta Vaishnav Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 4621 of 2018

¶5

REKHA SINGH

¶6

1 - Mamta Vaishnav W/o Nand Kishore Vaishnav Aged About 32 Years Presently Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher (Panchayat Primary School Bagichapar (Birgaon) Block Mungeli District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner

¶7

versus

¶8

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶10

3 - The Collector Mungeli, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

¶11

4 - Zila Panchayat Mungeli Through- The Chief Executive Officer Mungeli, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Mungeli, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... respondents

¶12

For Petitioner : None appears. For State/Respondents : Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, PL

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board

¶14

17.06.2026

¶15

Heard.

¶16

On 26.04.2024, following order was passed :

¶17

“Mr. Shayonkar, Advocate submits that original counsel for petitioner Shri Shaleen Singh Baghel, Adv. has been emplaned as State counsel. Therefore, he may be permitted to file his Vakalatnama in the case and to argue the matter.

¶18

Permission as prayed for is granted.

¶19

Upon filing of fresh Vakalatnama of the counsel, Registry shall remove the name of Shri Shaleen Singh Baghel, Advocate from the cause list on the further dates of hearing.

¶20

Learned State counsel also prays for sometime to file

¶21

-2-

¶22

reply in the matter.

¶23

List this case upon receipt of reply.”

¶24

It appears that till date, Vakalatnama has not been filed on behalf of the

¶25

petitioner.

¶26

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief :

¶27

“10.1) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records of the case from the authorities concerned for its kind perusal.

¶28

10.2) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondent Authorities to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Shiksha karmi Grade II/ Teacher (Panchayat).

¶29

10.3) Any other relief or relief(s) which this Hon'ble Court may think proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted.”

¶30

A perusal of writ petition would show that the petitioner is claiming promotion to the post of Teacher as she was appointed to the post of Assistant Teacher(Panchayat) on 04.06.2005.

¶31

It is informed by Mr. Tripathi, Advocate that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed as she has been promoted to the post of Teacher vide order dated 10.10.2022.

¶32

Having considered the submissions made by Mr. Tripathi and perusal of order dated 10.10.2022 would reveal that the petitioner has already been promoted to the post of Teacher and thus, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed . However, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive her prayer if cause of action still subsists.

¶33

Sd/(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge

¶34

Rekha

Mamta Vaishnav v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mamta Vaishnav v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Avtar Dhruv Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vijay Sharma Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Kunti Jaiswal, Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Krishna Prasad Verma Vs General Manger (Ma.S.)

The Sub Area Manager Vs the Appellate Authority

Smt. Shashi Yadu Vs State of Chhattisgarh