Smt. Shashi Yadu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

¶1

1

¶2

Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE

¶3

2026:CGHC:24333

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPS No. 1713 of 2021

¶7

Smt. Shashi Yadu, W/o Late Shri Satya Prakash Yadu, Aged About 59 Years, Working As Upper Division Teacher And Posted At Nagar Palika , Girls Higher Secondary School Bhatapara, Block Bhatapara , District Balod Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

1- State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Urban Administration And Development , Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya New Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶11

2 - Joint Director Department of Urban Administration and Development , 3rd Floor , Rda, Building Shastri Chowk, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶12

3 - Chief Municipal officer Municipal Council Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

¶13

	... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner	: Mr. Krishna Kumar Dewangan, Advocate
For State	: Mr. R.C.S. Deo, Panel Lawyer
Respondent No.3	: Mr. Gagan Tiwari, Advocate

¶14

Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

¶15

Order on Board

¶16

17/06/2026

¶17

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):-

¶18

“10 (i). That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent to grant arrears of

¶19

2

¶20

Samayman Pay Scale (Time pay Scale) during 23.12.2006 to 01.12.2017, in the interest of justice.

¶21

(ii). Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.”

¶22

Mr. Dewangan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner, who is working on the post of Upper Division Teacher under respondent No. 3, has not been paid the arrears of time pay scale for the period from 23.12.2006 to 01.12.2017.

¶23

On instructions, Mr. Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3 would submit that steps have already been initiated to make the payment to the petitioner and a letter has been issued by respondent No. 3 to the effect that immediately after audit of the accounts, the claim of arrears of time pay scale of the petitioner would be paid.

¶24

Mr. Deo, learned Panel Lawyer would support the contention made by Mr. Tiwari.

¶25

I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the letter issued by respondent No. 3 dated 20.05.2026.

¶26

In the letter dated 20.05.2026, it is mentioned that the arrears of time

¶27

pay scale would be paid to the petitioner immediately after audit of the her account.

¶28

Taking into consideration the contents of letter dated 20.05.2026 and the submissions advanced by Mr. Tiwari, this petition, at this juncture, is

¶29

3

¶30

disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 3 to take appropriate decision with regard to the payment of arrears of time pay scale to the

¶31

petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of 150 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶32

With the aforesaid observation(s) and direction(s), the writ petition

¶33

stands disposed of .

¶34

Sd/-

¶35

Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE

¶36

Nadim

Smt. Shashi Yadu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Shashi Yadu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Avtar Dhruv Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vijay Sharma Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Kunti Jaiswal, Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Krishna Prasad Verma Vs General Manger (Ma.S.)

The Sub Area Manager Vs the Appellate Authority

Mamta Vaishnav Vs State of Chhattisgarh