Ashish Tiwari v. Smt. K.K. Pushparjini
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner alleged willful disobedience of an interim order in First Appeal No.559 of 2017 on the ground that the first respondent transferred the disputed property during its pendency. The Court held that the order only protected possession and did not restrain alienation, so there was no disobedience.