Disposed

Sudhakar Hatwar v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC19 Jul 2026WPS/1353/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Retired Executive Engineer sought mandamus for interest on delayed retiral dues. Petition withdrawn with liberty to approach the High Power Pension Redressal Committee. Court directed the Committee to decide within three months after hearing, with all pensionary benefits completed in that period.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty before the High Power Pension Redressal Committee; time-bound directions issued.

Sudhakar Hatwar Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

CGHC010046242026

2026:CGHC:30781

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPS No. 1353 of 2026

¶7

1 - Sudhakar Hatwar S/o Lt. Ganpat Rao Hatwar Aged About 74 Years R/o House No. Hig 19 Shankar Nagar Sector -01, Raipur, Police Station, Civil Line, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 497007

... Petitioner

versus

AMARDEEP CHOUBEY

Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2026.07.21 10:54:27 +0530

¶12

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Chief Engineer Public Works Department, Sector 19, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh 492002

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

(Cause title taken from CIS)

¶15

For Petitioner	: Mr. Shrestha Gupta, Advocate
For Respondents/State	: Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiyan, Dy.G.A

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

¶17

Order on Board

¶18

20.07.2026

¶19

By way of present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following

¶20

reliefs:-

¶21

“10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to compute and pay interest on all

¶22

¶23

delayed retiral and service-related dues of the petitioner, at a rate deemed appropriate by this Hon'ble Court (preferably 18% per annum), from the respective original due dates till the date of actual payment within a stipulated time in accordance with law.

¶24

10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to further direct the respondents to direct the respondents to expeditiously consider and decide the pending representations submitted by the petitioner relating to interest on delayed payments of retiral dues.

¶25

10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to award costs of litigation in favor of the petitioner.

¶26

10.4 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief deemed fit in the interest of justice.”

¶27

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was working on the post of Executive Engineer at Public Works Department, Government of Chhattisgarh and on 30/06/2007, the petitioner has been retired from his service. However, there is a dispute regarding the payment of retiral dues in respect of the petitioner, hence, he seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to raise grievance of the petitioner before the High Power Pension Redressal Committee.

¶28

Learned counsel for the respondents has not opposes the submission made by learned counsel for the respondents.

¶29

¶30

In view of the above, the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. The Committee shall consider and pass a reasoned order within a further period of 3 months, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including retiral dues of the employee and other pensionary benefits, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶31

The petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petition to learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents for forwarding the same to the Committee.

¶32

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. SD/-

¶33

(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge

¶34

Amardeep

Sudhakar Hatwar v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhakar Hatwar v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gaurav Pathak Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Aasharam Aditya Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Premlal Ogare Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mukesh Kumar Raut Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ashok Paretkar Vs Manoj Kumar Pingua

Kuber Dongre Vs State of Chhattisgarh