Dismissed¶22

Church of Christ Mission in India, v. Employees Provident Fund Organization

Chhattisgarh HC2 Feb 2026WPL/20/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition; Church of Christ Mission in India v. EPFO (Regional P.F. Commissioner-II, Area Enforcement Officer), S.D.O. and District Education Officer, Bilaspur; WPL No. 20 of 2026; Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; Justice Sachin Singh Rajput; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue remedy under law; impugned order Annexure P/12 returned; NAFR; order dated 03/02/2026.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn at petitioner's request, with liberty to avail the remedy available under the law; certified copy of impugned order (Annexure P/12) to be returned after retaining attested photocopy. ¶22

Church of Christ Mission in India, Vs Employees Provident Fund Organization — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:6126

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPL No. 20 of 2026

¶6

Church Of Christ Mission In India, A Society Registered Under The Provision Of Society Registration Act, 1860 (Act No. Xxi Of 1860) Through Its Secretary Birim Sai Toppo, S/o Jogiya Ram Toppo Aged About 54 Year R/o Mission Compound Kududand Bilaspur C.G

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - Employees Provident Fund Organization Through Its Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-Ii District Office Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

¶10

2 - Area Enforcement Officer Employees Provident Fund Organization Bilaspur (C.G.).

¶11

3 - Sub Divisional Officer Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶12

4 - District Education Officer Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶13

		...	Respondents
For Petitioner	:	Mr. Mayank Moolchandani,Advocate
For Res. No. 1 & 2 For Res. No3/State	: :	Mr. Sunil Pillai, Advocate Mr. Rohitashva Singh, Deputy Advocate	Government

¶14

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

¶15

Order On Board

¶16

03/02/2026

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to

¶18

withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to avail the remedy available to him under the law.

¶19

¶20

Not opposed by learned counsel for the other parties.

¶21

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner,

¶22

this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶23

Certified copy of the impugned order (Annexure P/12) be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining attested photocopy of the same.

¶24

Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput ) Judge

¶25

Ami

¶26

AMITA DUBEY

¶27

Digitally signed by AMITA DUBEY Date: 2026.02.05 17:12:42 +0530

Church of Christ Mission in India, v. Employees Provident Fund Organization

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Church of Christ Mission in India, v. Employees Provident Fund Organization

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manappuram Finance Limited, Vs Shalj Nathaniel

Smt Antim Rai Vs the Managing Director

Kiran Kumar Vs Rajkumar @ Santosh

Ruksana Bibi Vs Abdulla Khan

Dharmendra Kumar Soni Vs Ramesh Kumar Soni

Shivanand Dhiwar Vs State of Chhattisgarh