Kiran Kumar Vs Rajkumar @ Santosh

¶1

1

¶2

Digitally signed by PAWAN PAWAN KUMAR KUMAR Date:2026.02.02 17:13:25 +0530

¶3

NAFR

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WP227 No. 128 of 2026

¶6

1 - Kiran Kumar S/o Shri Virendra Kumar Vishwakarma Aged About 45 Years (Now 61 Years), Caste Hindu Lohar Vishwakarma, R/o Mohalla Pacharighat, Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶7

2 - Mohan Kumar S/o Shri Virendra Kumar Vishwakarma Aged About 37 Years (Now 59 Years), Caste Hindu Lohar Vishwakarma, R/o Mohalla Pacharighat, Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶8

3 - Rajendra Kumar S/o Shri Virendra Kumar Vishwakarma Aged About 32 Years (Now 57 Years), Caste Hindu Lohar Vishwakarma, R/o Mohalla Pacharighat, Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶9

... Petitioner(s)

¶10

versus

¶11

1 - Rajkumar @ Santosh S/o- Shri Virendra Kumar Vishwakarma Aged About 40 Years R/oLink Road Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶12

2 - Sanjay Kumar @ Lallu S/o Shri Virendra Kumar Vishwakarma Aged About 38 Years R/o- Link Road Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶13

3 - Smt. Poonam Vishwakarma W/o Late Shri Ajay Kumar @ Bhuru Vishwakarma Aged About 30 Years R/o- Virendra Maruti Works Shop, Link Road Bilaspur, Tahsil And DistrictBilaspur (C.G.)

¶14

4 - Chunnu @ Gudda @ Chhota Bhuru S/o Late Shri Ajay @ Bhuru Vishwakarma Aged About 5 Years (Now 24 Years), R/o Virendra Maruti Works Shop, Link Road Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶15

5 - Shailendra Kumar @ Sonu S/o Late Virendra Kumar Vishwakarma Aged About 33 Years R/o- Link Road Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶16

2

¶17

6 - Smt. Sushma Vishwakarma W/o Shri Rajesh Kumar Vishwakarma Aged About 40 Years R/o Lohar Para Jabalpur, District Jabalpur (M.P.)

¶18

7 - Narayan Prasad Vishwakarma S/o- Shri Mahadev Prasad Vishwakarma Aged About 55 Years R/o Pacharighat Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶19

8 - Smt. Shashi Bai Vishwakarma W/o Late Shri Dhannuprasad Vishwakarma Aged About 54 Years R/o Loharpara Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.)

¶20

9 - Smt. Sharda Bai Vishwakarma W/o- Shri Hariprasad Vishwakarma Aged About 50 Years R/o Loharpara Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.)

¶21

10 - Smt. Sushila Bai Vishwakarma W/o Shri Shankar Prasad Vishwakarma Aged About 48 Years R/o Near Kanch House Jabalpur, District Jabalpur (M.P.)

¶22

11 - Shyamu Prasad Vishwakarma S/o Shri Sahdev Vishwakarma Aged About 45 Years R/oPacharighat, Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶23

12 - Smt. Lata Bai Vishwakarma W/o Late Shri Raju Prasad Vishwakarma Aged About 35 Years R/o Lohar Para Takhatpur, Tahsil- Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶24

13 - Smt. Binda Bai W/o Late Shri Jagdev Prasad Vishwakarma Aged About 66 Years R/oPacharighat, Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶25

14 - Yogesh Kumar S/o Shri Sukdev Vishwakarma Aged About 58 Years R/o- Pacharighat, Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶26

15 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶27

16 - Aadharshila Builders Private Limited Through Its Director Ajay Shrivastava, Aged About 49 Years (Now 53 Years), S/o- Late Shri J.P. Shrivastava, R/o- Tilaknagar Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶28

... Respondent(s)

¶29

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Agarwal, Advocate For State : Mr. T. L. Bareth, PL

¶30

Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

¶31

Order on Board

¶32

02/02/2026

¶33

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming following

¶34

reliefs :

¶35

10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire records regarding present case from Courts below. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to setaside the order dated 13.11.2025 passed by the learned 4th

¶36

3

¶37

Civil Judge Senior Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) in Execution Case No. 534/2010, parties "Kiran Kumar & others Vs. Rajkumar & others" (Annexure-P/1) and further be please to direct to the learned Executing Court i.e. First Additional Judge to the Court of First Civil Judge Senior Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) to ensure the execution of judgment and decree dated 23.03.2007 and handed over the possession of the question land after partition upto 1/9 shares of the petitioners/decree holders within stipulated time, is in the interest of justice.

¶38

10.3 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just, in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.

¶39

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned 3^rd Civil Judge Class-I, Bilaspur, CG in Civil Suit No. 12-A/2006 passed the judgment and decree of declaration which reads as under:-

¶40

क ) वा�दी�गण , ्ቚति�वा�दी� ्ቅ ाሰ��क 1 वा�रे�न ् क�ाሰ�रे क� उतिाሰ�ला�बा�ई से� उत्प्ቐ से � �न है । ख ) ्ቚ त्ये�क वा�दी� ቇኋ�ाሰ चा�टी�डी�है तिबाला�सेप�रे ቝኌ)*� भू,तिाሰ ख०न० 167/10 ቌኔ�्ቔफला 0 -70 एकड़ भू,तिाሰ ाሰ3 से� 1/9 तिहै)से� बा�टीवा�रे� करे� करे कब्जा� ्ቚ�्቎ करेन� क� अधि9क�रे� है । -

¶41

( ग ) ्ቚ त्ये�क वा�दी� जा,न� तिबाला�सेप�रे ቝኌ)*� भू,तिाሰ खसेरे� नम्बारे

¶42

157/1,161/1,164/1,164/10 एवा� काሰቦቐ�< ቌኔ�्ቔफला 1 - 34 एकड़ भू,तिाሰ ाሰ3 से� 1/9 तिहै)से� क� बाटीवा�रे� करे�करे कब्जा� ्ቚ�्቎ करेन� क� अधि9क�रे� है ।

¶43

घ ) ्ቚ ति�वा�दी� ्ቅाሰ��क । से� 6 )वाये� क� एवा� वा�दी�गण� क� भू� वा�दी व्येये वाहैन करे�ग3।

¶44

घ ) अधि9वाሹኋ� ቦቐ�ल्क ्ቚाሰ�तिण� हैAन� परे ्ቚाሰ�ण� प्ቔ अन�से�रे अ*वा� अन�से,चा� अन�से�रे जाA भू� न्ये,न हैA , वा�दीव्येये ाሰ3 जाAቦቐ जा�वा�।

¶45

Thereafter, the respondents preferred an appeal before the First Appellate Court, i.e., the learned 9th Additional District Judge (FTC), Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. The learned First Appellate Court vide its judgment dated 19.12.2008 passed in Civil Appeal No. 02-A/2008, dismissed the

¶46

4

¶47

appeal preferred by the respondents. Against the said judgment, no further proceedings were initiated by the respondents. The petitioner thereafter filed an execution application for enforcement of the judgment and decree dated 19.12.2008; however, till date, the same has not been taken to its logical conclusion. Thus, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Executing Court may be directed to conclude the execution proceedings expeditiously, in the light of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi &

¶48

Others reported in (2021) 6 SCC 418 .

¶49

Having considered the limited prayer made by Mr. Agrawal, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Executing Court to make all endeavors to conclude the execution proceedings keeping in mind the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Rahul S. Shah (supra), if there is no other impediment.

¶50

With the aforesaid observation(s), and direction(s), the instant petition is hereby disposed of.

¶51

Sd/-

¶52

(Sachin Singh Rajput)

¶53

JUDGE

¶54

Pawan

Kiran Kumar v. Rajkumar @ Santosh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kiran Kumar v. Rajkumar @ Santosh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivsahay Soni Vs Ramesh Soni

M/S Shubh Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Vs Alok Mahawar

Raj Agrawal Vs Jawahar Lal Agrawal

Ashok Kumar Shrivastava Vs Ayodyanath Mishra

Kodu Ram Dwivedi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Khoman Lal Sahu Vs Vijay Kumar Ruchdani Dead through Lr. Wife Anita Ruchdani