Dismissed¶25

Smt. Parveen Akhter v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC11 Mar 2026WPCR/500/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur, WPCR No. 500 of 2025, decided 12.03.2026, Per Ramesh Sinha CJ with Ravindra Kumar Agrawal J. Petition by Parveen Akhter and Shaheen Khan to quash/set aside FIR No. 0294/2025 dated 05/08/2025 of PS Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar, registered under Sections 296, 3(5), 351(2) BNS (respondents: State of Chhattisgarh and Abdul Sattar Khan). Counsel withdrew the petition as charge-sheet already filed; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take recourse to law. No merits decided; no precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to take recourse to law. ¶25

Smt. Parveen Akhter Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

NAFR

MANPREET KAUR

2026:CGHC:11831-DB

Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.03.16 10:59:25 +0530

¶6

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 500 of 2025

¶7

1 - Smt. Parveen Akhter W/o. Sheikh Nizamuddin, Aged About 56 Years R/o- Rahman Gali, Pathraguda, Veer Sawarkar Ward- 5, Jagdalpur, Dist- Bastar (C.G.)

¶8

2 - Smt. Shaheen Khan, W/o. Sheikh Irfanuddin Aadil, Aged About 29 Years R/o Rahman Gali, Pathraguda, Veer Sawarkar Ward No. 05, Jagdalpur, Dist.- Bastar (C.G.)

¶9

... Petitioner(s)

¶10

versus

¶11

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Sho, Police Station- Jagdalpur, Dist. - Bastar (C.G.)

¶12

2 - Abdul Sattar Khan, S/o Late Abdul Rahman Khan, Aged About 54 Years R/o Rahman Gali, Pathraguda, Veer Sawarkar Ward No. 05, Jagdalpur, Dist- Bastar (C.G.)

¶13

... Respondent(s)

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shubham Dwivedi, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Baghel, G.A.

¶15

Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge

¶16

Judgment on Board

¶17

Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

¶18

12.03.2026

¶19

1. Heard Mr. Shubham Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Government Advocate for respondent No.1 / State.

¶20

¶21

2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:-

¶22

“(I). That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ to set aside the impugned F.I.R bearing no. 0294/2025 dated 05/08/2025 registered at P.S-Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar u/ss. 296, 3(5), 351(2) of BNS against present petitioners, being apparently bad in law, and as such liable to be set aside by this Hon'ble court in the interest of justice.

¶23

(ii). That, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give such other relief(s) as this Hon'ble Court deems fit, in the interest of justice.”

¶24

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh stating that in the present matter, charge-sheet has already been filed against the petitioner and the same needs to be challenged further.

¶25

4. In view of the same, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn , with liberty to take recourse to law.

¶26

5. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1 / State is present.

¶27

Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha ) Judge Chief Justice

¶28

Manpreet

Smt. Parveen Akhter v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Parveen Akhter v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

In the Matter of Suo Moto Public Interest Litigation Vs the Union of India

Md. Junaid Chauhan @ Md. Junaidraza Chouhan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Gram Panchayat Mohgaon Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Akil Arsad Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Sandeep Mishra

Amlon Tirkey Vs State of Chhattisgarh