Pankaj Kumar Taunde v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition concerning panchayat matters was dismissed for want of prosecution after neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared despite the matter being called twice.
Writ petition concerning panchayat matters was dismissed for want of prosecution after neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared despite the matter being called twice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Digitally signed YOGESH by YOGESHTIWARI CGHC010060552023 TIWARI Date: 2026.07.25 11:40:40 +0530
2026:CGHC:31811
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 857 of 2023
Pankaj Kumar Taunde S/o Latel Ram Aged About 32 Years R/o Ward No.3, Basti Para Pamgarh District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2 - Collector District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh
3 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh
4 - Sub-Divisional Officer Rural Engineering Services, Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh
5 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh
6 - Teras Ram Yadav S/o Late Horilal Yadav Aged About 58 Years Address Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh
... Respondents
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner : None For State : Mr. S.S. Choubey, Government Advocate For Respondents No.3 : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, Advocate on and 5 behalf of Mr. Soumya Rai, Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board
24.07.2026
1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner, nor is any representation
2
been called twice. Earlier, the matter was treated as a "not reached" case. Thereafter, when it was taken up in the first round, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Even in the second round, neither the petitioner nor any counsel representing the petitioner has appeared.
2. Mr. S.S. Choubey, learned Government Advocate, appears for the State. Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, learned counsel holding brief for Mr. Soumya Rai, learned counsel for respondents No. 3 and 5, is also present.
3. From the continued absence of the petitioner and his counsel, it appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in prosecuting the present writ petition. This Court, therefore, has no option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge
Yogesh
Pankaj Kumar Taunde
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development
Collector District Janjgir Champa
Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Janjgir
Sub-Divisional Officer Rural Engineering Services, Pamgarh
Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Pamgarh
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court