Dismissed¶24

Hemlal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Writ Petition (Civil) – disposal as infructuous

Chhattisgarh HC8 Jul 2026WPC/5621/2022

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; WPC No. 5621 of 2022; Hemlal Sahu (through SPA holder Ramkumar Sahu) v. State of Chhattisgarh and revenue authorities (Collector/SDO/Tehsildar/Patwari/Revenue Inspector, Jaijaipur, Janjgir-Champa); decided 09.07.2026 by Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J.; writ petition dismissed as rendered infructuous by efflux of time due to changed circumstances; no adjudication on merits; no statute or precedent cited; NAFR.

What did the court decide?

Having regard to the submissions of counsel and the changed circumstances, no further adjudication is required in the writ petition. ¶24

Hemlal Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

YOGESH Digitally signed byYOGESH TIWARI TIWARI Date: 2026.07.0918:21:46 +0530

CGHC010413302022

2026:CGHC:28483

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶7

WPC No. 5621 of 2022

¶8

Hemlal Sahu S/o Gokul Sahu Aged About 78 Years Caste - Teli, R/o. Village - Jaijaipur, Police Station And Tehsil - Jaijaipur, District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.). Through Special Power Of Attorney Holder Namely - Ramkumar Sahu, S/o. Shri Firat Ram Sahu, Aged About - 32 Years, R/o. Village - Rogda, Tehsil - Navagarh, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

versus

¶11

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Janjgir - Champa, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh

¶12

2 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Jaijaipur, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh

¶13

3 - Tehsildar Jaijaipur District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh

¶14

4 - Patwari Patwari Halka No. 16, Jaijaipur, Post, Police Station And Tehsil - Jaijaipur, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh

¶15

5 - Revenue Inspector Jaijaipur, Post, Police Station And Tehsil - Jaijaipur, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh

¶16

... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Rijwan Alam, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For State/Respondents : Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer

¶17

Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge

¶18

Order on Board

¶19

09.07.2026

¶20

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the circumstances which had given rise to filing of the petition have undergone a change

¶21

¶22

and, by efflux of time, the relief sought for in the present writ petition has already become infructuous. He, therefore, submits that nothing further survives for consideration in the present petition and the same may accordingly be disposed of as having rendered infructuous.

¶23

2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not dispute the aforesaid submission and submits that he has no objection if the writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶24

3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the changed circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no further adjudication is required in the present writ petition. Since the relief claimed by the petitioner has become infructuous by efflux of time, the present writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge

¶27

Yogesh

Hemlal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hemlal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Shri Hanuman Travels Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rupesh Kumar Kaushik Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Anil Udasi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vinod Lalwani (Partner M/S - S.S. Rice Mill) Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sanjeev Agrawal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Krishna Kumar Lahari Vs State of Chhattisgarh